Protestors flock to City Hall to criticize controversial gang violence bill

Becks Lawson Avatar

On the night of May 6, one man decided to hold a protest against the recent H.R. 336, a bill submitted by Representative Lucas Evans that would authorize a database of criminal organizations and a new criminal charge for gang related violence. Julio Hernandez, who performs under the name DJ Spooky, was the first person to set up the protest. However, dozens of citizens soon gathered at City Hall to join Hernandez, and the crowd later moved the protest to the Vinewood Police Department.

Hernandez has what he calls a “disdain” for H.R. 336, explaining: “I felt like it was poorly written and it creates a lot of loopholes that can hurt everyone in the city, especially those that are not affiliated.”

At this time, Evans has stated that the intent of the bill is “to create more specific guidelines for law enforcement to help with their investigations and keeping database of gang members, The other purpose is for harsher punishment which in tern would hopefully cause Violent Gang Members to think about the possible punishment of their actions before they go out and commit a Violent Crime against someone or numerous other people.”

The bill has created a firestorm on Y, the platform formerly known as Twitter, with members of the public agitating against the bill since its submission on May 5. Some claim that the bill would grant the police new powers that could easily be abused. Others worry that the standards are too loose, which could create false positives in the database. As citizens gathered at City Hall, they mocked the bill by declaring themselves the “Uwu Gang”, pressing their index fingers together in an attempt to showcase the absurdity of the bill’s standards.

The protest was briefly interrupted by four officers who spoke with Hernandez, asking if he had weapons on his person. According to Hernandez, an anonymous caller reported him to law enforcement, claiming that he was brandishing weapons. “Although I was frisked and I was approached in a manner as though I were a person with a weapon, [the officers] were decent about it,” says Hernandez.

The Gang Violence Act does have its defenders, with Duncan Murray speaking out on Twitter and referring to it as his bill. Marshal Oliver McKenzie was also outspoken in favor of the bill. The next State Representative meeting is currently planned for Saturday, May 11th at 6PM. The meeting will be open to the public, and we’ll doubtlessly hear more questions and concerns regarding H.R. 336.


9 responses

  1. Bystander Avatar
    Bystander

    Oh, yea. Let’s want to be treated like scholars and adults but put our fingers together like children and act quirky against a bill that betters the public. It’s always the same people, these people don’t want any real change they just want to gum up the system if the system doesn’t specifically hold their hand for them. Piece of advice, grow up and be mature for once if you want to be taken seriously.

    1. Anonymous Avatar
      Anonymous

      Careful, scholar. Your fedora is slipping.

  2. Anonymous Business Owner Avatar
    Anonymous Business Owner

    As someone who’s had employees kidnapped from their business and shot, this literally only affects group members. Any other state, some of these groups would be terrorists and jailed for life. We have people literally drinking human blood up north, and gangs going around the city turning it into a warzone.

    If you roll round with a group, shooting people and taking hostages, why do your rights that are apparently being violated matter more than those who you shoot and take hostage? Fucking self-centered hypocrites.

  3. Land of the Delusianal Avatar
    Land of the Delusianal

    Like I said earlier only criminals or peeps with criminal friends hate this bill, and well wouldn’t you know, look at the majority on the photo and what groups they belong to.
    ”I’m sowwy that I slit your fweinds throat uwu p-please don’t pass t-the anti gang b-bill >w< that would be so =w= of you''

    We live in a state where aiming a gun at someone is seen at acceptible and having people kidnapped and dumped is seen as ''normal'' it's damn time that we had some real consequences for these crooks, and anyone voting against the general idea of this bill should be labled an enemy of the state and it's hard working people.

    The fact that we can't even comment on this without using our actual name out of fear of mass harrasment or worse from these crooks is proof enough. The Police is failing us and it's not even their fault even if I wish it was.

  4. The mountain of right Avatar
    The mountain of right

    There’s not enough punishment for committing crime in this state, in my opinion. People crying about this bill are the issue. Criminals are not scared to commit crime at all. Clearly them protesting means that this is a good thing, right?

    All these groups care about is coming out on top and killing cops, which there’s not enough punishment for either. I will never understand the constant agro towards Law Enforcement who are just trying to do their jobs, they’re people too. The point of this bill is to be able to charge groups involved in mass criminal activities (such as a shootout) more effectively.

    People don’t value each other and that’s the problem. If they cared about themselves more they’d actually be scared to commit these kinds of acts. This bill is needed, they can cry about it more.

  5. lol Avatar
    lol

    What kind of criminals “protest”? Pathetic :’)

  6. Ghost of Benning Avatar
    Ghost of Benning

    You cannot trust the government to come up with legislation for this when all they have ever passed are “feel good” bills. You should have listened to Benning almost two years ago when he warned you of this.

  7. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    This Bill is horrifically written, and while intended to be used under a noble cause, it doesn’t protect certain civilians in the state that actually have no affiliations. I promise you that everyone is aware of the intentions. Its the unintended that’s worrisome, and even more worrisome is the visceral reaction from LEOs about this Bill with little to no regard for the well-being of those unaffiliated. Seems as though they only give a shit about cleaning up the gangs, not giving a damn about who else gets innocently caught up in the crossfire.

    And they wonder why the people hate them more so than ever before. God forbid they’re wrong about something. God forbid they have to reflect on literally anything. It’s always gotta be everyone else. Not them.

  8. […] going off half a dozen times was audible from the lobby, although the courthouse remained closed. Another public protest occurred a week ago on May 7, challenging the controversial H.R. 336; the previous protest remained peaceful […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *